Keith and I are pleased to announce the immediate availability of TeleBT, a new Altus Metrum ground station product providing the equivalent of TeleDongle plus Bluetooth.

TeleBT working with AltosDroid on an Android device provides everything needed to monitor a rocket in flight, record telemetry, and know how to walk right to the airframe after it's back on the ground.

The Bluetooth capability of TeleBT is also supported by AltosUI on Linux, and with a micro USB cable TeleBT works just like TeleDongle on Windows, Mac, and Linux systems running AltOS version 1.2.1 or later.

In my post about Batteries and Pyro Circuits, one of my suggestions was to remove the protection circuit board from LiPo cells used with Altus Metrum flight computers. To help out folks who want to do this themselves, I put together and posted a how-to with photos in the Documents section of our web site.

Keith and I have discovered a change in the behavior of the protection circuits integrated in the LiPo batteries we sell for use with Altus Metrum products that poses a risk for our customers. This post is meant to document what we now know, communicate changes we're planning as a result, and explain what we think flyers of our existing electronics and batteries may want to do to maximize their chances of successful flights.

Background

Choosing batteries and designing pyro circuits for high power rocketry avionics involves a variety of trade-offs. Reliability is the highest concern, both because nobody wants to lose an airframe due to a failed pyro event, and also because airframes recovering anomalously have safety implications. But we also care about other factors including cost and weight, and usually want to minimize the complexity of both the electronics and the overall installation.

The objective of a pyro circuit is to dump enough energy rapidly into an electric match to cause it to catch fire. We need batteries both to power the electronics that decide when to fire the charge, and to provide the energy that actually ignites the match.

The two most common battery types seen in the rocketry hobby are alkaline cells, often the nominal 9V rectangular variety, and rechargeable batteries based on Lithium Polymer (LiPo) chemistry. LiPo cells are 3.7 volts per cell nominal voltage, are very light, and have a high energy density.

LiPo capacity is measured in units of current times time, so an 850mAh cell should be able to deliver 850 milliamps for an hour. The battery industry also uses something called a "C rate" to describe how fast the battery can be usefully discharged, wich is a multiplier relative to the battery capacity. So a battery with 850mAh capacity and a "2C" rating can deliver current at a sustained rate of 1700mA until discharged, while the same capacity at a "5C" rating can deliver 4250mA.

By comparison, most 9V alkaline batteries are actually composed of 6 individual 1.5V cells enclosed in a wrapper. It's hard to get hard numbers for capacity and discharge rate, since in an alkaline cell the two are not independent, and the discharge rate is related to the volume of each individual cell. The data sheet for an Energizer 522 shows just over 600mAh at a 25mA discharge rate, dropping to about 300mAh at a 500mA discharge rate.

Importantly for use in pyro circuits, LiPo cells have a very low source impedance, which means they can source immense amounts of current. It's not unusual for cells in the 1000mAh range to have ratings in excess of 30C! Because this rapid discharge ability can pose a risk of fire, it's common for LiPo cells to come with a "protection board" integrated into the battery assembly that is designed to limit the current to some rate such as 2C continuous duty.

In large airframes, or projects that involve staging, air-starts, or other complex pyro event sequences, the most reliable approach will always be to use separate batteries for the control electronics and the source of pyro firing power. In the limit, having separate pyro batteries for each pyro charge with the control electronics only providing the switching to connect the batteries to the charges could even make sense. But for most airframes, this is overkill, and the increases in mass, volume, and wiring complexity just don't make sense.

The challenge, then, is how to design electronics that will robustly initiate pyro events without negatively affecting the rest of the electronics when operating from a single shared battery.

Altus Metrum Pyro Circuits

The very first prototypes of TeleMetrum were designed to use a single-cell LiPo battery, and had an on-board 100mA charging circuit. Because we needed 5 volts to power the accelerometer, we had a small switching regulator that up-converted the LiPo voltage, and we used some of that regulator's output to charge a 1000uF capacitor. The pyro circuit used Fairchild FDN335N N-channel MOSFET switches in a low-side switching configuration to dump the energy stored in the capacitor through an attached ematch. Those FETs had an on resistance of under a tenth of an ohm in our operating conditions. The circuit worked very reliably, but the 1000uF electrolytic cap was huge and we struggled with the mechanics of such a large part hanging off the board...

It turns out that 3.7 volts is way more than enough to fire a typical low-current e-match or equivalents like the Quest Q2G2 igniters. In fact, bench testing with a good digital oscilloscope showed that a typical e-match with resistance of 1.3-1.8 ohms will fire in approximately 13 microseconds when hit with the nominal 3.7 volts from a LiPo.

So, starting with our v0.2 boards, we switched to using the LiPo battery voltage directly to fire the pyro charges, eliminating the clunky electrolytic capacitor entirely. We also switched to the Fairchild FDS9926A dual N-channel MOSFET whose specs are better in all regards for our application. The on resistance is down around 40 milli-ohms in our circuit, such that the current ratings are much higher (FET current limits are primarily driven by how much heat is generated due to current flowing through the channel's on resistance).

Because using the LiPo voltage directly means we're effectively temporarily putting a very low resistance across the battery during the pyro events, the input voltage to the voltage regulator gets pulled down. To ensure the processor could "ride through" these events, we added a 100uF surface mount bulk capacitor on the 3.3 volt regulated voltage rail, which bench testing demonstrated was more than sufficient to maintain processor operation through pyro events. And that is essentially the same pyro circuit on all the boards, both TeleMetrum and TeleMini, that we have shipped to date.

What's Changed

The LiPo batteries we source and sell with our electronics come with a protection board and cable terminated in a 2-pin, 2mm "JST" connector. The specs on the protection board have always been "2C continuous", but we observed the ability to source much higher currents for short periods such as the 13 micro-seconds or so required to fire an e-match. Thus these protection circuits seemed just fine .. we could fire e-matches with a burst of current but were protected against short circuits in the wiring or our boards by the 2C continuous limit.

Unfortunately, the most recent batch of batteries we sourced seem to have a much "twitchier" protection circuit. We can draw more than 2C for short bursts, but not as much as with prior boards, and not for as long an interval. With a 1 ohm power resistor on the pyro terminals of one of our boards, we get about 9 milliseconds of power before the protection circuit cuts in and shuts the battery down. The power stays down until all load is removed, which at least means the board is turned off and back on again, and in some cases could even mean the battery is unplugged and re-plugged since we draw trace current to keep the GPS memory alive even when the power is turned off, and at least some of the new batteries see that as enough to keep the power turned off after an over-current event.

For many e-matches, this isn't an issue, since 9 milliseconds is way longer than the 13 microseconds needed to fire the charge. Unfortunately, we've discovered that many of the e-matches bought and used in the rocketry hobby are actually made for use in the fireworks industry, where it is desireable to retain continuity after firing so that series connections of e-matches all can fire even if some fire faster than others! This means that while the resistance goes up some after firing, sometimes the drain on the battery remains sufficient to cause the protection circuit to kick in even after the pyro charge has fired.

What We're Doing About It

If we remove the protection circuit from the LiPo (or jumper around it), all existing Altus Metrum products will operate successfully with pyro charges thave have an effective resistance of as low as 1 ohm. That's lower than any e-match or Q2G2 we've ever seen, so in effect what this means is that if you have an existing Altus Metrum flight computer, and you remove the LiPo protection circuit, you're good to go. This does not really make things any more "dangerous", since our battery chargers are all current limited and our discharge patterns will never cause heating of the battery. Frankly, in a rocket, the most likely way to cause a problem with a LiPo is by smashing or puncturing the actual battery during bench work or during a crash... and those cause the same problems with or without a protection board present.

In the future, we will ship batteries that have either a much higher C rating on the protection circuit, or have no protection circuit at all.

The number of problems reported by actual customers that we think should be attributed to LiPo protection circuit boards is very low, and we suspect most of our customers who are happily flying their boards can continue to do so. Ground testing where you fire pyro charges (or at least e-matches) using RF to issue the commands (not USB, since the LiPo charger is running any time USB is connected!) will confirm whether there's a problem. If the board resets (does startup beeps) after a pyro event, or shuts down completely (no LED activity), then you have a problem. If the matches light and the board keeps running, you're good to go.

However, any Altus Metrum customer with LiPo batteries sourced from us or our distributors who is worried about this problem (even if you haven't seen problems in ground testing or previous flights), and who doesn't want to try soldering on the battery circuit board yourself, is welcome to contact us about removing the protection circuit for you. We won't charge anything other than shipping.

To take advantage of this offer, just send email to fixmybattery@altusmetrum.org telling us how many of which capacity batteries you have that you'd like updated, and we'll respond with an RMA number and shipping details.

Going Even Further

As previously indicated, with the LiPo protection circuits removed, all of our current products will work reliably with at least 1 ohm across the pyro terminals. That should cover all real-world flying conditions just fine, but we're not satisfied yet.

We've designed a new pyro control circuit that transfers the maximum possible energy to the load regardless of battery voltage without ever allowing the voltage to the processor to droop at all. We're testing this new circuit in various prototypes now, and if it pans out it will probably show up first in MegaMetrum and then trickle down to TeleMetrum and TeleMini as those products are updated later this year. The new pyro circuit tolerates 0 ohms (dead shorts) on the pyro terminals for as long as the battery can provide current, which is as good as it gets. We think the circuit is clever enough that we'll probably write more about it once we're finished validating it.

Altus Metrum is pleased to announce our first-ever "Shiny Black Friday" event! We're combining a special, one-time discount on TeleMini products with a price reduction on TeleMetrum boards ... and a new product introduction!

For one day only, Friday, 23 November 2012, we are offering a special $50 discount on TeleMini Starter Kits (regular $225, now only $175!) and TeleMini boards (regular $125, now only $75!). This discount is available only for direct orders from our web site, see below. TeleMini is a baro-only recording dual deployment altimeter with radio telemetry and direction finding features. Learn more about TeleMini at

• http://www.altusmetrum.org/TeleMini/

We are also pleased to announce that TeleMetrum is back in stock after a brief production delay. To celebrate, we are dropping the price of extra TeleMetrum boards from $350 to $325. Starter kits will continue to sell for $400. TeleMetrum is a dual-deploy altimeter with accel and baro sensors, GPS, and radio telemetry and direction finding features all on one board! Learn more about TeleMetrum at

• http://www.altusmetrum.org/TeleMetrum/

Last, but certainly not least (unless we're talking size or mass!), we are proud to introduce a new product... MicroPeak! MicroPeak is a tiny board that provides highly accurate peak barometric altitude recording. About the size and weight of a US dime with battery ready to fly (18x14mm, 1.9 grams), this is the ideal altimeter for model rocket contests. MicroPeak is so easy to use that it's also the ideal altimeter for young people working on rocket related science fair projects, etc! MicroPeak sells for $50, learn more at

• http://www.altusmetrum.org/MicroPeak/

Find more information on all Altus Metrum products at http://altusmetrum.org. The special Black Friday discount on TeleMini products is available only on orders placed through Bdale's web store at http://auric.gag.com.

Thank you for making 2012 such a great year for Altus Metrum, LLC. We're having fun, and look forward to introducing several exciting new products in the weeks and months ahead!

When Keith and I released a new version of AltOS, the open source firmware and software system associated with our Altus Metrum hobby rocket avionics systems last week, we forgot to mention one small but really neat new feature Keith spontaneously added a few months ago. When a rocket is on the rail waiting to launch, we now beep out the igniter continuity status over the radio link instead of just sending periodic audio beeps.

This is particularly useful when flying TeleMini, which is just too small to include an on-board beeper. Previously, you had to check the ground station computer to see if the board powered up correctly and was ready to fly. Now all you need is an HT tuned to the right frequency, which is easy to have in your pocket or clipped on your belt while preparing a rocket for flight!

Son Robert and I made heavy use of this last weekend flying at the Tripoli Colorado Fall Frenzy 2012 launch, where 4 of our 5 flights were in TeleMini-equipped rockets set up for apogee-only electronic recovery deployment with motor backup. I also found it really handy when setting up YikStik3 on the flight line at Airfest 18. It was hard to hear the altimeter beepers on the two TeleMetrum boards buried deep in the airframe, but they were loud and clear through the HT in my back pocket!

Thanks, Keith! So much improvement in flight-line experience from so little code...

FreedomBox 0.1

Ian Sullivan posted a release announcement today regarding the first FreedomBox public release, which we're calling 0.1.

This release is, frankly, long overdue. Getting here has been harder and taken much longer than any of us intended. Fortunately, now that we've reached this milestone, I believe that making regular progress towards the vision we have for a "1.0" release will get easier.

FreedomBox is far from the only thing that I'll be working on after my upcoming early retirement from HP, but hopefully I will succeed in putting far more time towards the project soon than I have been able to in the past.

I am pleased to announce that HP accepted my application for participation in this year's Enhanced Early Retirement program. After 26.5 years, my last day at HP will be 31 August 2012.

This isn't because I have a problem with HP, quite the contrary! I feel immensely privileged to have worked on so many interesting things with so many smart people for so long. And there are many exciting things happening right now, including high profile projects like Odyssey and Moonshot expanding both ends of the server scaling continuum with Linux, and the immense commitment to and investment in Open Source represented by the use of Open Stack and Ubuntu LTS in building HP Cloud. The temptation to stay and continue to help guide HP's Open Source engagement was strong. I'm certainly under no pressure to leave... in fact, I think I managed to shock my management with my decision to retire!

But I'm very excited about "taking a break" from full-time employment for a while to focus more time on things that matter a lot to me. My son and I have a number of projects we'd like to work on together as he enters high school. The side business I started two years ago with Keith Packard to design, build, and sell avionics solutions for high power model rockets is growing and could use more attention. I'm in the midst of designing the processor board for another amateur radio satellite. And of course, I'm looking forward to putting more "quality time" towards Free Software projects like FreedomBox and Debian!

Since they do not depend on my employment status, I do not expect any immediate changes in the various roles I play outside of HP. I will continue to serve on the board of the Linux Foundation representing individual affiliates, on the board of the FreedomBox Foundation, as Chairman of the Debian Technical Committee, and as President of Software in the Public Interest. And while I hope to travel less than I have in recent years, I look forward to continuing to speak and otherwise participate in key Free Software conferences around the world from time to time.

After I retire, the primary point of contact with HP on Open Source matters will be the Director of HP's Open Source Program Office, Phil Robb. But if there are open issues regarding HP and Open Source that I can help with over the next month, feel free to contact me and I'll see what I can do to help.

We've had sporadic Altus Metrum customer reports about RF susceptibility issues with their TeleMetrum installations. In almost every case, these problems have been completely resolved by either making sure the system battery has sufficient charge before launch, or through the application of standard engineering techniques such as twisting wire pairs to reduce differential coupling. However, even when every technique we could think of had been applied, once in a while someone still had issues.

Around the time of LDRS this year, the incidence of such reports seemed to increase. One customer, in particular, had an installation in which he virtually always saw continuous resets of the board once his 54mm airframe was put on a launch rail, and several customers reported seeing board resets during ejection charge firing. Keith and I saw a board reset during main charge firing happen in person at NCR's Oktoberfest, and with a couple days available to work together after that launch, we decided it was time to figure out what was really going on.

Here's what we've learned.

In bench testing, it quickly became clear that the problem was the 3.3 volt power supply rail getting pulled down far enough to reset the CPU. This most frequently happened during ejection charge firing, when the input of the LDO regulator is pulled down by the near-short presented by the e-match when a pyro FET is turned on. To keep the 3.3 volt rail voltage up during firing, we include a 100uF bulk capacitor on the regulator's output. In all of our prior bench testing, we never saw the 3.3 volt rail droop significantly. Clearly something had changed... or maybe several things had changed?

The first thing I wondered about was whether the new Kalman filtering code, which requires more compute cycles from the processor, might be consuming enough more power to pull the rail down faster during charge firing. After poking around at it, though, we have no data to suggest the new code makes a measurable difference in power consumption.

The next thing we pondered was that at least some of the e-matches we and others are using in the hobby now come from the fireworks industry, where it is apparently considered a feature for the match to retain continuity after firing. This means the input of the LDO gets held down for longer than with the e-matches we used to use and Quest Q2G2 igniters that open when fired. But that still didn't make sense as the root cause, as we chose the FET firing time such that even with a dead short across the igniter terminals, the 3.3 volt rail wouldn't be pulled down far enough to cause trouble during firing.

One of the big changes between v1.0 and v1.1 on TeleMetrum was that the newer boards incorporate a better reset circuit. This helps ensure the GPS chip always comes up running at power on, which was a problem at temperature extremes with older boards. However, a side-effect of this change is that a v1.1 board will reset any time the 3.3 volt rail drops below 3.15 volts, whereas older boards didn't trip until a much lower voltage. So the recent increase in reports might just be related to more v1.1 boards being placed in service?

While experimenting on the bench, we observed that injecting RF energy into the input of the LDO regulator had the effect of pulling down the output voltage, presumably because the internal reference source accumulates charge and is fooled into thinking the output is too high. Since our designs all have the power switch contacts ahead of the LDO, the wires going out to the switch and back are effectively an antenna... as are, to a lesser extent, the wires going to the e-matches. There is some variability from part to part in just how badly the LDO reacts. But by attaching a tuned length of wire as an antenna to the LDO input and playing around, we were finally able to reproduce the problem reliably on a test board at my bench!

On further analysis, we realized that the output of the USB battery charger chip and the input of the LDO both expect a 1uF bypass cap to ground. At some point, those looked redundant and we eliminated one of the two. Unfortunately, we weren't internalizing the fact that the switch leads were between the two caps, and the one we left was on the output of the charger and not at the input of the LDO. Placing a suitable bypass cap right at the input of the LDO turns out to have a truly dramatic effect on RF immunity!

Once we realized that RF getting into the LDO input was the problem, Keith pointed out that we used to see "noise" in the accelerometer data on earlier boards that was caused by the 3.3 volt rail moving slightly during radio transmit, which we fixed with a hardware change on v1.1. We are now convinced that this was at least partly related to RF coupling to the LDO input, not just the change in power consumption on the LDO output. We didn't realize what was going on in earlier testing because we often didn't have ematches wired up, so RF coupling was minimal. But going back to flights logged with v1.0 boards that included deployment, and studying the magnitude of the "steps" in acceleration data observed when the transmitter was on, Keith was able to compute the amount the 3.3 volt rail must have sagged if the real acceleration wasn't changing... which in some cases was as much as 180mV! We think this proves that RFI could cause the LDO to drop its output voltage below the reset controller set point on v1.1 boards.

Based on these observations, I'm making two hardware changes for the next version of TeleMetrum (version 1.2), and Keith is also making a software change. We have tested all of these changes on real boards both on the bench and in test flights, and the net effect is a major improvement in the RF immunity of TeleMetrum.

The first hardware change is moving to a slightly lower trip voltage on the reset controller. Instead of 3.15, the new part trips at 3.00 volts nominal. This gives us more "headroom" to tolerate 3.3 volt rail droop during charge firing, and will allow the board to operate longer on a given battery charge. This change is not relevant for v1.0 and prior.

The second hardware change is adding an appropriate bypass capacitor right at the LDO input. This requires a PCB update, but it's possible for me to update existing production boards by adding an 0402 cap right across the appropriate pins on the regulator chip.

The software change prevents our altimeters from turning on the radio transmitter while an ejection charge is firing. Since the RF transmitter draws substantial additional power, this should help keep the 3.3 volt rail from drooping. This may not really matter, but it feels like the right thing to do. This change will be part of our next stable firmware release.

We think most TeleMetrum customers need not worry about these updates. But if you have seen odd resets on the rail or during ejection charge firing in flight with a TeleMetrum v1.1, feel free to contact me about updating your existing board to include these improvements.

Keith and I released version 1.0.2 of AltOS, the open source firmware and software system associated with our Altus Metrum hobby rocket avionics systems.

This release includes a fix for the defect in version 1.0.1 that prevented rebooting an altimeter from idle to pad mode over the radio link. This affects both TeleMetrum and TeleMini boards, and re-flashing the altimeter firmware is required to pick up this fix.

We also restored the pre-1.0 mode selection behavior for TeleMetrum at power on. This is also an altimeter firmware change, but does not affect TeleMini.

FreedomBox activities at Debconf11

I spent the last two weeks of July 2011 in Banja Luka. The occasion was the annual Debian developer's conference, Debconf11 and preceding work week known as Debcamp. This was my tenth successive year attending Debconf, and I had a very productive and pleasant time! The facilities were good, the local team was friendly, enthusiastic, and very helpful, and in addition to giving three talks and hosting a couple panel discussions, I managed to put a burst of energy into work on FreedomBox. Several other developers working on FreedomBox were also present, and a good number of Sheeva and Dream plugs were evident in the hacklabs sporting new FreedomBox stickers. Working together in the same place for several days, we made good progress on several projects, and also had some great discussions about what we want to do going forward.

image building tools

For some time, I've been working towards a light-weight tool set to build FreedomBox software images. Shortly before Debconf started, I chose the name 'freedom-maker' for this tool and shared a link to a readable copy of my git repository with other developers I expected to work with in Banja Luka. With input from Bert Agaz and Jonas Smedegaard during Debcamp, freedom-maker went from almost useful to actually useful. It still deserves work to be more useful to others, but I have now pushed a copy of the git repository to git.debian.org so that we can take advantage of the tools supported there to enable others to more easily contribute to the code.

Very soon, Bert plans to add support to freedom-maker for using Lars Wirzenius' vmdebootstrap to build x86 images suitable for testing in a virtualized environment. At the same time, we plan to refactor the existing code slightly to enable lists of desired packages for the various image flavors we expect to produce independently of the configuration for each specific image building tool.

Jonas continued in parallel to work on his alternate packaging toolset boxer. It offers some potentially interesting features for the future, and we may eventually merge some or all of it into freedom-maker, but for now it remains a separate utility.

uAP user space tools

Several weeks ago, we received from Marvell the source code to two user space programs that are necessary for configuring and monitoring the binary firmware provided for the uAP wireless chip used in the DreamPlug. Early during my stay in Banja Luka, I packaged these for Debian as uaputl and uapevent, and I am pleased to note that they were quickly accepted into the archive and are now present in Debian mirrors.

u-boot

Another bit of code received very shortly before Debconf started was the source for the version of u-boot shipped by Globalscale in the DreamPlug units we're working with. During Debcamp, Clint Adams passed a copy of this source to Jason Cooper, who was already trying to add support for the DreamPlug to upstream u-boot, but had stalled due to a lack of information. Jason has now merged his own work with the sources we got from the manufacturer, and is making good progress towards merging DreamPlug support into upstream u-boot. Once that happens, we should be able to flash our Sheeva and Dream plug devices with a u-boot image built from the source in the Debian u-boot package, in the process enabling things that matter to us like the ability to boot from an ext2 partition, and hopefully the ability to execute command scripts from that partition instead of having to hard-code kernel filenames in flash. This will allow us to support the ongoing effort in Debian to move away from the need for kernel symlinks.

DreamPlug kernels

With respect to kernels, another work stream at Debconf primarily involving Héctor Orón and Nick Bane was to analyze the current state of the patches from Marvell and Globalscale used to support the DreamPlug against both upstream and current Debian kernel sources. To my surprise and our collective pleasure, the remaining patch set required against current upstream kernels is much smaller than we previously believed! There are still several patches critical to us that are not merged upstream, but the work remaining to be able to build images for our devices from mainline and Debian kernel source trees now seems like something we might be able to complete before Debian's next stable release.

One of our discoveries during the u-boot and kernel work during Debconf was that Globalscale did not obtain a new machine id for the DreamPlug, but instead re-used the one for the GuruPlug series, despite there being some differences in the hardware that require at least one additional driver. After much discussion, we plan to continue using the existing machine id instead of requesting another, particularly because the ARM kernel community has apparently stopped issuing new ids for the moment. We will add a new kernel config option for the DreamPlug, however, and are likely to build distinct Sheeva and Dream kernel packages that do not require initrd for use in FreedomBox images, even if doing so is not strictly necessary. This will allow us to optimize both the in-memory footprint and boot times for our devices.

software configuration

Another area of investigation in Banja Luka was technology for package configuration. Mirsal Ennaime performed various tests using debconf and Config::Model, with some results reflected in this commit relating to configuring the bitcoind daemon in the bitcoin package for Debian.

identity and trust management

While we did not actually do any FreedomBox specific work on the trust management layer we know is necessary, after several rounds of conversation, I am now more convinced than ever that the right path forward is to base our trust relationships on OpenPGP keys using GnuPG and Monkeysphere as starting software elements. Our thinking to date is captured on an Identity Management page in the wiki.

communication services

Another thing that became fairly clear to me during discussions at Debconf is that in the near term, planning to build communication services around XMPP is the approach most likely to give good results. Investigating the software choices available to build an interesting XMPP infrastructure is now a high priority for me. Jonas has done some work towards configuring and integrating ejabberd or Prosody, I've started studying yate as a possible call manager and VoIP server choice with XMPP/jingle support, and we await with great interest a release from the Buddycloud developers to evaluate as a possible basis for deploying social network services.

Some of these software choices will lead us to use Apache as our web services base technology because of the need for features that only it supports well among daemons that are Free Software.

Jonas completed packaging GNU Sip Witch for Debian, and it is now available in the mirror network. Tzafrir Cohen and Jonas did some initial testing on its use.

documentation

A number of new wiki pages were written (or at least started) in order to sum up ideas, design various aspects of FreedomBox, and reflect discussions that happened during DebConf11. A lot of work is needed to complete these pages though, as well as others to capture more of the current state of the project.

press coverage

Finally, while in Banja Luka I got some great press coverage for FreedomBox! On Sunday the 24th, I was interviewed by the main television network serving the Republika Srpska. This led to a couple of minutes of coverage near the top of the national news program that night, immediately following the lead story about the President and several ministers appearing at Debian Day that morning to help open the conference. This interview was later re-used in another TV program that summarized Debconf11. On the morning of Thursday the 28th, I was part of a small group that spent more than an hour meeting with the Minister of Science and Technology in his office, and the relationship between Debian and our work on FreedomBox was one of the items of discussion in that meeting and the associated press conference. I'm told this resulted in more press coverage, but if true I have not seen it yet.

summary

On Friday afternoon the 29th, I gave a talk in the main Debconf program containing a FreedomBox Progress Report . In it, I talked about the structure of the FreedomBox Foundation, progress the foundation has made, and the work that was still then underway in Banja Luka. It was streamed live over the internet, and replays are available online. The reaction from Debian developers present was very positive, which was good to learn since by that time my energy level was quite low after the nearly two weeks of intense technical and social interaction that is Debconf!

All in all, we got lots of work done on FreedomBox in Banja Luka, enough that I think at least the next few steps along the road towards an eventual "1.0" release of a reference implementation are now much clearer than they were two weeks ago!